knightrider

About

Username: knightrider
Joined: March 26
Visits: 72
Last Active: April 5
Roles: Member

Comments

@Arockiya_r - Cool ! It seems to be working. Thanks !

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 31
@Arockiya_r - I can still place AMO orders from an unregistered IP. Are you sure that the validation check is already there in your production environment?

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 31
@Arockiya_r - Is the static IP check in production? I can still place AMO orders without registering any IP.

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 31
@Arockiya_r - Okay ! Thanks for the prompt and detailed explanation ! Cheers !!

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 30
@Arockiya_r - Strange ! My orders when converted from SL-LIMIT to MARKET (with market_protection=-1) do not show the shield icon in the orders. Instead, those seem to be executed as LIMIT orders. Can you please check why is that?

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 30
@Matti - I also have the same problem as @DaneshBansal. My SL limit to MARKET order is not getting market protected despite specifying the market_protection field in modify_order() method in python.

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 30
@Arockiya_r - Awesome ! Thanks a lot !!

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 27
@Arockiya_r - Example: - I have an trigger-pending SL-LIMIT order - Sometimes, before hitting the trigger, I need to square the order off the position. In that case, instead of cancelling the existing trigger-pending SL-LIMIT order and creating a …

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 27
@Arockiya_r - Please make sure to consider the case of modify_order() when I'm trying to modify an existing LIMIT-SL order to MARKET order. Thank you !

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 27
Good news @adarsh1392 @RS6006 @scaars13 @yogeshs ! Market protection parameter is working with the PR: https://github.com/zerodha/pykiteconnect/pull/218 Earlier, I mentioned that it did not work because I was receiving {"market_protection": 0} in …

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 27
@adarsh1392 - Maybe they'll take cognisance of this issue once they see their brokerage go down quite significantly ! @kiteapi @kiteconnect

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 27
@adarsh1392 - It's not about adding parameter while calling the method, the definition of the place_order() in kiteconnect.py [kiteconnect package] needs to accept that parameter right. I was talking about that.

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 27
@Nivas @Sravanthi_bh - Can we please get clarity on the ETA? There are only 1.5 trading days left before 1st April (Tuesday is a holiday). Thanks !

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 27
@adarsh1392 - You might not have updated the place_order() in kiteconnect.py to accept that parameter.

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 27
@RS6006 - Yea, but, as a standard practice, it's not recommended to update the site-packages manually. Especially if the system is docker containerised, it becomes unnecessary burden to update the package in a manual way. Btw, during my testing tod…

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 27
@scaars13 @yogeshs - Someone has already opened a PR for it (I think it should work, I'll be testing it tomorrow). https://github.com/zerodha/pykiteconnect/pull/218 If you're using requirements.txt for python, just replace kiteconnect with this: ht…

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 26
@kiteapi

in Market protection feature in kite connect api Comment by knightrider March 26
@kiteapi

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 26
@Matti - URGENT MATTER ! Seems like the market_protection parameter is still not there in 5.0.1 [python] This can become a huge problem if not fixed URGENTLY.

in Preparing to comply with SEBI's retail algo rules (Static IP, ratelimits, order types) Comment by knightrider March 26
cc: @nagavenij

in Market protection feature in kite connect api Comment by knightrider March 26
@Nivas @Sravanthi_bh - URGENT MATTER ! Seems like the market_protection parameter is still not there in 5.0.1 [python] According to zerodha (https://kite.trade/forum/discussion/15912/preparing-to-comply-with-sebis-retail-algo-rules-static-ip-ratelim…

in Market protection feature in kite connect api Comment by knightrider March 26