Hi Sujith, I still see 1135 candle data skipped when historical_data is fetched. I understand the issue came due to some network failure which stands corrected as per the bulletin. However, missed candles in historical_data can cause errors in certain backtesting implementations which take into account indexing(rather than absolute timestamp), assuming 75, 5minute candles are formed in a day.
Please look into this. Can we have some copy of candle data at 1135?
Hi Sujith, Could you please give a sense on when these missing candles are likely to be included in the historical data fetched through the API ? Thanks.
I still see 1135 candle data skipped when historical_data is fetched.
I understand the issue came due to some network failure which stands corrected as per the bulletin.
However, missed candles in historical_data can cause errors in certain backtesting implementations which take into account indexing(rather than absolute timestamp), assuming 75, 5minute candles are formed in a day.
Please look into this.
Can we have some copy of candle data at 1135?
Could you please give a sense on when these missing candles are likely to be included in the historical data fetched through the API ?
Thanks.